Anti-SLAPP protections · 2025 Report Card
Can they sue you for saying it?
The cheapest way to silence a critic is not to win a lawsuit — it is to file one. Leave a bad review, complain to a regulator, publish a story, and the reply can be a writ you will spend two years and six figures answering. An anti-SLAPP law is the off switch: get it thrown out early, and send the bill to whoever filed it.
Ten states still have no off switch at all.
- 41
- Jurisdictions with a working law
- 10
- With nothing at all
- 9
- Scoring a perfect 100
- 85
- Median score of 100
Find your state
Colored by the Institute for Free Speech's anti-SLAPP score — deep red is no statute at all, green is the full set of protections. Click any state.
3 states the report card hasn't caught up with
The 2025 Report Card is the newest edition, and three states changed the law after it was published. Their grades below are the ones IFS still shows. The statutes are real and in force — which is why the map outlines them rather than painting them red.
House Bill 4045 adopted the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act, making Michigan the 39th state with statutory anti-SLAPP protections.
Enacted December 23, 2025
South Dakota became the 40th state to enact statutory anti-SLAPP protections.
Enacted March 16, 2026
- MissouriD-
Missouri replaced its narrow public-hearing statute with the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act.
Enacted July 14, 2026
What actually makes a law bite
Two thirds of the score is how much speech the statute covers. One third is what it does once it applies — and that part is scored on five things, which are the five questions worth asking of any anti-SLAPP bill.
- up to 20 pts
Case pauses while the motion is heard
- up to 12 pts
Plaintiff must show the case has merit
- up to 25 pts
Denial can be appealed at once
- up to 40 pts
Winning defendant recovers legal costs
- up to 3 pts
Courts told to read the law broadly
A law can cover every kind of speech and still be near-useless with none of these. Virginia scores 100 on coverage and 10 on protections.
All 51, ranked by score
| State | Grade | Score | Incidents logged |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware | A+ | 100 | 8 |
| Hawaii | A+ | 100 | 4 |
| Idaho | A+ | 100 | 10 |
| Iowa | A+ | 100 | 17 |
| Kentucky | A+ | 100 | 26 |
| Maine | A+ | 100 | 6 |
| Montana | A+ | 100 | 3 |
| Ohio | A+ | 100 | 37 |
| Utah | A+ | 100 | 12 |
| California | A+ | 99 | 558 |
| New York | A+ | 99 | 249 |
| Oregon | A+ | 99 | 294 |
| Georgia | A | 98 | 37 |
| Colorado | A | 97 | 44 |
| Nevada | A | 97 | 18 |
| New Jersey | A | 97 | 85 |
| Oklahoma | A | 97 | 10 |
| Tennessee | A | 97 | 28 |
| Vermont | A | 97 | 6 |
| Minnesota | A- | 93 | 189 |
| Washington | A- | 93 | 37 |
| Kansas | A- | 92 | 13 |
| Texas | A- | 92 | 69 |
| Louisiana | A- | 90 | 10 |
| Connecticut | A- | 89 | 4 |
| Indiana | B+ | 85 | 16 |
| Pennsylvania | B+ | 83 | 48 |
| Rhode Island | B | 80 | 3 |
| District of Columbia | B | 79 | 249 |
| Virginia | C+ | 70 | 56 |
| Arkansas | C | 61 | 13 |
| Florida | C- | 59 | 75 |
| Illinois | C- | 59 | 120 |
| Massachusetts | D+ | 49 | 40 |
| Arizona | D+ | 46 | 28 |
| Maryland | D | 37 | 27 |
| New Mexico | D | 31 | 11 |
| Missourinew law since | D- | 26 | 37 |
| Nebraska | D- | 11 | 14 |
| Alabama | F | 0 | 16 |
| Alaska | F | 0 | 4 |
| Michigannew law since | F | 0 | 33 |
| Mississippi | F | 0 | 8 |
| New Hampshire | F | 0 | 8 |
| North Carolina | F | 0 | 36 |
| North Dakota | F | 0 | 16 |
| South Carolina | F | 0 | 10 |
| South Dakotanew law since | F | 0 | 1 |
| West Virginia | F | 0 | 4 |
| Wisconsin | F | 0 | 21 |
| Wyoming | F | 0 | 1 |
9 jurisdictions score a full 100 (Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Montana, Ohio, Utah). Twelve are graded F, of which 10 genuinely have no statute.
What this page does not claim to be
There is no published press freedom index for US states. Reporters Without Borders and Freedom House score countries, not states, and we did not invent a substitute — a composite of our own would be an opinion wearing a number. What is here is one published score, presented as its authors published it, and one public incident log, presented as a log.
Anti-SLAPP law is one input to press freedom and not the whole of it. Shield laws, public records law, and how courts actually behave all matter and are not scored here.
Grades and scores: the Institute for Free Speech's Anti-SLAPP Statutes: 2025 Report Card. Incident counts: the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker, 2014–2026, used under CC BY 4.0. Both retrieved September 19, 2026. Incident counts since January 1, 2021 are shown on each state page. The score is IFS's own judgement and is not part of the FreedomRankings score. None of this is legal advice.
